Diabetes the deeper understanding 

Diabetes the deeper understanding 

Having been an adviser of 10 years and in the industry for over 20, it's not often I come across things with insurance that I haven't seen before.

And while Diabetes in the insurance realm is nothing new, it has typically focused on the top-level diagnosis for underwriting rather than the reality people are going through. 

  • Are we dealing with Type I or Type II?
  • And the relevant answers to this from the perspective of what an insurer will cover and at what level. 

Which is typically a case of "no" for a lot of stuff.

However, I've had the opportunity to understand what this looks like for those living with Type I Diabetes. This is the insulin-dependant type of Diabetes that involves lots of finger pricks and needles. Not exactly my favourite topic, and I now have a deeper appreciation of what People with Type I Diabetes go through. 

And those with Type I consider it quite normal and find others' reactions to the number of needles involved somewhat comical. I guess it comes with the territory that we don't always consider, out of sight, out of mind.

A little closer to home for all, Olympian Valerie Adams' son has Type I Diabetes. 

  • Valerie has been courageous in sharing her story with being a parent of a young child with Type I, and it is hard work, very hard work.
  • You can find Valerie's account on TikTok, where Valerie has shared some of this experience with her audience.
  • Valerie is also one of AIA's brand ambassadors.

What has been quite surprising to me is the equipment and cost associated with living with Type I Diabetes, and it's quite different to Type II, which more people appear to be aware of.

I've nicknamed it the Diabetes Tax because it is.

When it comes to managing Type I Diabetes, most people will have the idea of pricked fingers to test blood glucose levels and injections for insulin. And for a good number of People with Type I Diabetes, this is what their daily routine consists of.

We also know this approach, if it is not diligently managed, can result in less than ideal management of Diabetes and the subsequent serious complications that come with that. 

However, like most things in medicine, technology has impacted and is improving lives, and it is doing some incredible things. But it comes with a cost, a pretty significant one.

The new technology is impressive and also fascinating too.

  • Insulin pumps that give accurate and measured insulin doses at the right time.
  • Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM), though this is more every 5 minutes than constant like your heart rate tracker in your watch.

But they don't talk that well; the person still has to manually manage their insulin dosing from what they read from their CGM. This can introduce errors and mean that things can still get forgotten, which isn't particularly safe for Type I. 

  • Too much insulin can be life-threatening; too little is similar, though not as quickly. Sugar highs, like alcohol, come with hangovers.
  • Some of the newer expensive gear will talk between the CGM and the pump. When you're talking $8,000 for a pump, people are not running out for a new one in a hurry.

Like most things where costs are high, people get creative. Several open-source third-party tools and devices have been developed, where they communicate with the transmitters and some of the pumps.  

  • This is from an app on the person's phone using the CGM data to a radio device that instructs the pump what insulin to deliver.
  • Basically, a prosthetic pancreas outside the body. Really important for kids when they need assistance to manage this otherwise. 

This gives people a significant level of everyday independence too.

Neat tech that has come out of a garage which is making a massive difference to Type I's. 

The clinical reports provided to those using these added tools show they have a significantly better medical journey than the traditional needles and syringes approach. 

And this is the rub, and you've probably heard about the US issues with the cost of insulin; the pharmaceutical companies are milking their patients because Type I's have little choice if they want to remain healthy. 

When you have a closer look at this, it gets damn expensive.

The Dexcom G6 CGM kit are consumable items and needs 36 sensors and four transmitters per year to operate. Plus, a bunch of other consumables that I'll discuss shortly. 

  • This costs $380 per month on a subscription basis or $4,560 per annum. And that's a saving on the outright purchase cost, if not having the subscription, of $6,360 per annum.

Yup, that's the cost to have good monitoring to ensure you stay as healthy as possible. Currently, none of this is subsidised.

When talking to those with Type I Diabetes, the behaviour of pharmaceutical companies has been a bit of an eye-opener. Not in a good way. 

  • The transmitters are set up as a solid-state device, have no user-serviceable parts, and stop working after three months. 
  • With the older generation ones, someone figured out you can open them up, change the batteries, and re-use them, using a software tool "reset" them, and away you go again. You have to seal them back up with epoxy.
  • And the batteries last about six months... So a 50% saving there on devices, but there's some jiggery-pokery to do to make it work.

The sensors are interesting; they sit under the skin and are designed to last a week. Most Type I's will use them longer than this, up to 14 days, by traditional testing and calibrating them to address degradation and sensor accuracy until they stop working. 

So another 50% saving here too. Which the medical fraternity will advise is dangerous and certainly not recommended. But funds for many families to manage this are limited, so shortcuts get taken.

Even with these hacks and tips, that still means that the typical Person with Type I Diabetes is shelling out about $2,500 per annum to have this stuff work.

And that doesn't include the app and devices to make it all talk that are third party and has both costs and challenges, not to mention additional hardware requirements like phones and computers to make it all work. 

These third-party tools are not certified medical devices; they come with the risk that they could malfunction and cause serious issues and are typically self-made or imported as kits. This means there needs to be a level of skill required to make this work.

So what is subsidised?

There is not a great deal from my discussions outside the traditional approach of insulin, injections, needles, and prick testers.

  • Insulin Pumps are funded by Pharmac under certain criteria. High Hba1c or severe Hypos (Hypoglycemia), and A new pump is funded every 4 years.
    • There's some challenge with the new sensors where they are supposed to operate for ten days, except they barely last more than a week with some people's metabolisms.
    • This isn't being explained, but it sounds like more pharmaceutical companies extracting cash rather than just providing the tools.
    • And they wonder why people have a poor perception of Big Pharma?
  • The MoH supplies the tubes and connectors for insulin delivery with the insulin pumps again under funding criteria. With a consumables re-application is every 2 years

And that's about it. 

So what's the insurance response? More here

Jon-Paul Hale

Written by : Jon-Paul Hale

1000 Characters left


Postal Address:
PO Box 301792
Albany
Auckland